Craft v. Campbell Soup Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
A judge of this court called for en banc review. A vote was taken and a majority of the non-recused active judges did not vote in favor of en banc review. The sua sponte call for en banc review is therefore DENIED.
The opinion filed on December 2, 1998, 161 F.3d 1199, is amended in accordance with the amended opinion attached hereto.
OPINION
We must decide the threshold issue of whether we have jurisdiction to hear Campbell Soup Company’s (“Campbell Soup”) interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that appellate…
3Cases cited39 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.