Legal Opinion
Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 22, 2002No. 01-16638PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge:
In this interlocutory appeal of a retaliatory discharge case, the court is asked to determine whether an employee’s refusal to agree to a compulsory arbitration provision regarding employment discrimination claims constitutes protected activity for the purposes of alleging a prima facie case of retaliation. We find that it does not. We therefore vacate in part the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. BACKGROUND
The appellant, Harden Manufacturing Corporation (“Harden”),- employed the ap-pellees, Anthony Weeks, Charles…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Smith v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Debbie Jaine Higdon v. Jerry JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.