Legal Opinion
Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2007No. 05-15737PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA, Circuit Judge:
Julie E. Collins and Robert B. Ryan (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to vacate an arbitration award. Appellants contend their motion should have been granted because the arbitrators manifestly disregarded the law when deciding not to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel 1 because judicial review of an arbitration award under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) is more limited than judicial review of a district court judgment. We hold the arbitrators did not manifestly disregard the law because no “well defined, explicit, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Norbert J. Skarbek v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Frank Brand, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Bosack v. SowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Richey v. Autonation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.