Legal Opinion
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 30, 2003No. C 01-4626 SBAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Arizona Cartridge Remanufac-turers Association (“ACRA”) and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Lexmark International, Inc (“Lexmark”).
Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, and the arguments presented by counsel at the September 9, 2003 hearing, the Court hereby DENIES ACRA’s Motion for Partial Summary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005