Legal Opinion

Monsanto Co. v. Parr

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 22, 2008No. 4:07CV0008ASPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.

This matter came for hearing on April 21, 2008 on the application of the Monsanto plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction against the defendant under the authority of Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 35 U.S.C. § 283. Pursuant to Rules 52(a) and 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its judgment.

Findings of Fact

1

Monsanto developed and holds patents on the Roundup Ready® transgenic trait…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Intervet America, Inc. v. Kee-Vet Laboratories, Inc., Robert D. Keenum, and Keenum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Organic Seed Growers & Trade Ass'n v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. North Carolina Farmers' Assistance Fund, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  3. Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API