Monsanto Co. v. Scruggs
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PEPPER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Monsanto’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts Six, Seven, Eight and Nine of Defendants’ Counterclaim (Defendants’ Antitrust Claims) [401-1]. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the response, the briefs of the parties, the authorities cited and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows, to-wit:
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In the mid-1990’s, Monsanto launched revolutionary new agricultural technologies. The new technologies have been described ad infinitum in other Memorandum Opinions issuing from the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Rio Grande Royalty Co. v. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Mitchell Scruggs v. Greg BostMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Monsanto Company v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Schoenbaum v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.