Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1954PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaeiceR, J.

The defendant’s assignments of error, except those that are formal, relate to the argument of the Solicitor for the State to the jury. The part of his argument assigned as error is as follows: “1. Officer Norwood and Sheriff Harrison are personally known to all of you for years, whereas this stranger from Texas is an unknown. Therefore, you have no choice but to take the word of the local officers against his.

“2. Just because he is a man of property, can afford an expensive Lincoln car is no reason why he can come through here and break our laws. The rest of us are not blessed with wealth and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API