State v. Bowen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendants were tried under a bill of indictment charging larceny and receiving. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, as charged in the second count of tbe bill of indictment. From this verdict and the judgment imposed pursuant thereto, the defendants appeal and assign error.
It is stated in the record that in the course of the Solicitor’s argument to the jury, he referred to the defendants, Hilbert Bowen and James McKeel, as “these two thieves,” to which remark counsel for the defendants interrupted the Solicitor’s argument and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. . HawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.