Legal Opinion

Lintz v. American General Finance, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 24, 1999No. 98-2213-JWLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Susan Lintz and Connie Dieci-due filed suit against defendants alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, K.S.A. § 44-1001 et seq. Following a trial on plaintiffs’ claims, the jury found that both plaintiffs were subjected to sexual harassment and further found that defendants were liable to plaintiffs for the harassment. The jury awarded no damages to plaintiff Lintz and awarded plaintiff Diecidue $25,000 in compensatory…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haddock v. Woodland Park Home, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Bauberger v. HaynesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
  3. Maestas v. Town of TaosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Lintz v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  5. Dartez (ID 87393) v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API