Legal Opinion
Bauberger v. Haynes
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 27, 2009No. 1:08cv15PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On May 15, 2008, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”). (Doc. 12.) Respondent (the “State”) timely raised several objections to the Recommendation (Doc. 14), and Petitioner William Thomas Bauberger (“Bauberger”) responded (Doc. 17). The court entertained oral argument on the objections on September 17, 2009. For the reasons set forth herein, the objections are overruled and the Recommendation is adopted.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts are…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bauberger v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Bauberger v. HaynesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Bauberger v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011