Legal Opinion

Lintz v. American General Finance, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 17, 2001No. 98-2213-JWLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Susan Lintz and Connie Diecidue filed suit against defendants alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, K.S.A. § 44-1001 et seq. Following a trial on plaintiffs’ claims, the jury found that both plaintiffs were subjected to sexual harassment and further found that defendants were liable to plaintiffs for the harassment. The jury awarded no damages to plaintiff Lintz and awarded plaintiff Diecidue $25,000 in compensatory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lintz v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ortiz y Pino v. Toulouse OliverDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
  2. Ortiz y Pino v. Toulouse OliverDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API