Legal Opinion
Sandvig v. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 25, 2002No. AC 20723PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiffs, Judy Sandvig and Karl Sandvig,1 appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant A. Dubreuil and Sons, Inc.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied her requests to amend her complaint, (2) granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because it applied the improper statute of limitations and (3) denied her motion for reconsideration. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The pleadings, affidavits and other documentary information presented to the court reveal the following facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Altfeter v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Garcia v. ITT Hartford InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Cookson Group, PLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.