Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 6, 1988No. 13168PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

This appeal arises out of a wrongful death action brought on behalf of three men who were asphyxiated in an underground fuel storage facility while employed by the defendant Norbert E. Mitchell Company. The plaintiffs, administrators of the estates of David C. Sharp, Robert Vidal and Alois Entress, alleged that the defendants, Norbert E. Mitchell, Sr., and Norbert E. Mitchell, Jr., d/b/a Norbert E. Mitchell Company, negligently caused those deaths. The trial court, McDonald, J., granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the counts of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API