Legal Opinion

MacDermid, Inc. v. Cookson Group, PLC

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 22, 2014No. AC35541PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

The plaintiff, MacDermid, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing three counts 1 of its complaint against the defendants, Cook-son Group, PLC, Cookson Electronics, Inc., and Enthone, Inc., on the basis of the prior pending action doctrine. 2 Although the plaintiff has acknowledged that the allegations of its complaint in this action (MacDer-mid II) and the allegations of its complaint in an earlier action that is still pending (MacDermid I) are virtually alike, the plaintiff claims on appeal that the defendants should have been judicially estopped from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Beaudoin v. Town Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Sherman v. RoncoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Sandvig v. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Seaport Capital Partners, LLC v. SpeerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Barton v. NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Bongiorno v. J & G Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API