Legal Opinion

Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1899No. Sac. No. 581PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County. John F. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

A demurrer to the complaint, as amended, was sustained; plaintiff refused to further amend his complaint, and the judgment was entered against him, from which he appeals.

From the complaint and amendments thereto it appears that on May 13, 1893, the defendant Halley executed a note for one thousand and fifty dollars to the defendant Bank of Tehama County, and on the same date, to secure the payment of said note, said Halley executed a trust deed of certain real estate to the defendants Brown and Cahoone, as trustees. Thereafter, and on the 26th of April, 1895; Herbert Kraft recovered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Young v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Matzen v. ShaefferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Persons v. ShaefferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dixon v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Smith v. State Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API