Persons v. Shaeffer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Butte. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
When the defendant executed the mortgages which this action was brought to foreclose, the judgment *80which Wilcoxson had obtained in an action to foreclose a prior mortgage was satisfied and discharged of record, and the court finds that the mortgagees of the subsequent mortgages had no notice or knowledge of any equities then existing in favor of Catherine Matzen who paid the sum due on the Wilcoxson judgment. In Matzen v. Shaeffer, No. 9,086, we held that as between the parties to that action the payment of the Wilcoxson judgment by Matzen operated as an equitable assignment of it to her, and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hargis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Land Title Insurance Corp. v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Richards v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gulick v. PeckenpaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.