Matzen v. Shaeffer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Butte. Suit to quiet title. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
It appears by the findings that it was arranged between the mortgagee, mortgagor, and appellant that she should pay the sum of thirty-five hundred dollars for the satisfaction of the mortgage, and a conveyance to her of the mortgaged premises by the mortgagor. This entire sum was handed to the mortgagee, who retained the amount due on the mortgage, and gave the residue to the mortgagor. Whereupon the mortgagor executed a conveyance of. the premises to appellant, and the mortgagee entered satisfaction of the judgment which he had previously obtained in an action to foreclose the'' mortgage.
Prev…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- White v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.