Dixon v. Morgan

The coihplainant insists that the court should apply the doctrine of subrogation or equitable assignment to the facts of this cause.

The undisputed facts, as set forth in the opinion of the court of appeals, are as follows:

“On November 12, 1919, I. G. Wright, his wife joining in the conveyance, conveyed by deed to John H. Morgan a tract of one hundred ninety-three acres of land in Gibson county for a consideration of $30,000, evidenced by promissory notes of Morgan payable to the order of Wright, bearing date of November 12, 1919, as follows: One note for $1,000, due January 1, 1920, one note…