Legal Opinion

Isakson v. Rickey

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1976No. 2550PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This appeal involves a challenge to a section of Alaska’s Limited Entry Act, AS 16.43.010 et seq., which was enacted by the State Legislature in 1973. The Act created the Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission and a scheme for precluding entry of some fishermen into the Alaska commercial fisheries. Appellants, all Alaska commercial fishermen, contend that a certain provision of the Act denies them equal protection of the laws and is therefore unconstitutional.

A brief review of the history of limited entry in Alaska is necessary to understand the positions of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API