Legal Opinion

Neider v. Spoehr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1968No. 247PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues are as follows:

1. Was the evidence insufficient to support an award for future loss of earning capacity?

2. Was the jury award of $20,000 for future pain, suffering and disability excessive?

3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in setting the amount of the award pursuant to the Powers rule 1 at $15,000?

In Reinke v. Woltjen (1966), 32 Wis. 2d 653, 660, 146 N. W. 2d 493, we reviewed the authorities on the subject of compensation for impairment of earning capacity and concluded the following:

“In determining damages to be awarded for impairment of earning capacity or loss of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fahrenberg v. TengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ianni v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hoeft v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API