Legal Opinion

Peil v. Kohnke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1971No. 201-204PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The issues involved on these appeals from the judgments entered following this fifty-four-day jury trial naturally divide themselves, as does the opinion, into three subjects: liability, damages and coverage. We will consider them in that order.

I.Liability

The issues presented on the liability phase of this collection of cases are as follows:

1. Did the expert witness, Professor James Van Vleet, presented by Badger State give an opinion based upon unestablished assumptions ?

2. Was his opinion on redirect examination that a “scuff mark” was “possibly” made by the (Kohnke) Cadillac’s right rear…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lorenz v. WolffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD. v. VellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Lesniak v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Milbauer v. Transport Employes' Mutual Benefit SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Roy v. St. Lukes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API