Legal Opinion
Doanbuy Lease and Co. v. Melcher
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1971No. 9215PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
The trial court dismissed these four consolidated actions purporting to act under and impose sanctions pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure [§ 21-1-1(37) (d), N.M.S.A., 1953]. Plaintiff-appellant (Doanbuy) appeals. We affirm.
The actions were brought to foreclose operator’s liens under an oil and gas operating agreement or alternatively to foreclose statutory operator’s liens against the defendants-appellees (Melcher Interests) and, so far as we are here concerned, are identical. A number of similar suits between these parties pend in other states.
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Independent Productions Corporation and Ipc Distributors, Inc. v. Loew's IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Brady v. Hearst CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
- Bourne, Inc. v. RomeroDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1959
- Bourgeois v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Miller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sandoval v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Pizza Hut of Santa Fe, Inc. v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.