Legal Opinion
Fong v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1962No. 16594PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWEN, District Judge.
This appeal brings before us issues of fact and law related to a certain ship *402sales and scrapping contract of February 2, 1948 between plaintiff’s agent, the United States Maritime Commission, and the defendant, T. Y. Fong, involving 15 of the plaintiff’s immobilized merchant vessels lying in Subic Bay in the Philippines on the date of the contract. Herein the parties will be called plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they were in the Trial Court.
The United States of America as plaintiff brought this action by the filing of its original complaint in the Trial Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peitzman v. City of IllmoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Blue Mountain Construction Company, a Corporation v. H. C. Werner and Tauf CharneskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Laurence Massa v. Jiffy Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Jackson v. HeiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. SchumacherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Research Automation Corporation, Konstantinos M. TserpesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Silge v. MerzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. YakubetsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.