Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1987No. L.A. 32260PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This is a proceeding to review the unanimous recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (Review Department) 1 that petitioner Jerome B. Rosenthal be disbarred from the practice of law in California and that he comply with the requirements of rule 955, California Rules of Court.

The Hearing Panel 2 of the State Bar Court (Hearing Panel) unanimously recommended petitioner’s disbarment and the Review Department unanimously adopted the panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in making its recommendation. As shall appear, we conclude that the Review…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Carter v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Calvert v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Walker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API