Legal Opinion
Independent Productions Corporation and Ipc Distributors, Inc. v. Loew's Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 2, 1960No. 35, Docket 26112PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff corporations allege a conspiracy to harm them in violation of the federal antitrust laws. Defendants, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.Code Appendix, 1958 Ed.), sought to examine the plaintiffs by taking pretrial depositions of one Herbert Biberman, as the corporations’ managing agent. Plaintiffs challenged the designation of Biberman as their managing agent and sought an order under Rule 30(b) barring defendants from taking plaintiffs’ corporate deposition by Biberman. Judge Sugarman denied plaintiffs’ motion,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert J. Gill v. Julius Stolow and Harry Stolow, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of J. & H. StolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Independent Productions Corp v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. PRC Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Cardox Corp. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.