Legal Opinion
State v. Rosedom
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 19, 1994No. 11269PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress physical *143evidence and (2) admitted multiple copies of police inventory forms. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I
The defendant first claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a beeper and money taken from his jacket and trouser pockets after they were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HermannConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Crocker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. ManiniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Wilson v. HryniewiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.