Legal Opinion

Pedro v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2021No. A170708PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 Argued and submitted July 28, 2020, reversed and remanded July 8, 2021 In the Matter of the Compensation of Maria I. Pedro, Claimant. Maria I. PEDRO, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION; and Ingallinas Box Lunch, Inc., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1705593; A170708

495 P3d 183

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board). At issue is the board’s affirmance of SAIF Corporation’s denial of claimant’s omitted condition claim under ORS 656.267(1) for an L4-5 disc protrusion. Although the board found that the disc protrusion was caused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Hammond v. Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. (In re Comp. of Hammond)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Cache Valley ElectricCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Barnes v. Cache Valley ElectricCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Beamon v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. Beamon v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Gibson v. ESISCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API