Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Spivey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 2016No. 143PA15Published

1DissentJustice Jackson

In concluding that an indictment for injury to real property pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 14-127 need not identify the owner or lawful possessor of *745the property, the majority ignores over one hundred and sixty years of precedent establishing that “[i]n indictments for injuries to property it is necessary to lay the property truly, and a variance in that respect is fatal.”1 State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 31, 34, 62 S.E.2d 497, 499 (1950) (quoting State v. Mason, 35 N.C. (13 Ired.) 341, 342 (1852)), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 831 (1951). I respectfully dissent.

Section 14-127 states, “If any person shall…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API