Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 2016No. 252PA14PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

*84In this case we must decide whether an indictment charging defendant with larceny is fatally flawed because it did not specifically state that a church, the alleged co-owner of the stolen property, is an entity capable of owning property, and whether the State presented sufficient evidence of defendant’s intent to commit larceny to support his conviction for felonious breaking or entering a place of worship. Because the name of a church necessarily imports an entity capable of owning property, we hold that the indictment was sufficient on its face. Furthermore, we conclude that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. SweezySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API