Smith v. Oosting
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Defendants Oosting and Hofsteen contracted with the State to construct eight miles of improved highway lying between Decatur and Glenwood. They gave the usual statutory bond prescribed by 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14829. The other defendants are sureties thereon. The contractors sublet to one Rodney McLeod, who owned a fleet of trucks, the job of hauling the gravel from the railroad cars and distributing it on the highway. Plaintiff was a vendor of gasoline and furnished McLeod gasoline with which to operate his trucks. After he had furnished gasoline to the value of $1,000, McLeod paid $300…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- City of Alpena ex rel. Besser v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lindquist v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Rosman v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. McQueen Smith Farming Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
- Overman & Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.