Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Southern Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 22, 1928PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Rees
Reversing.
The commissioners of sewerage of the city of Louisville entered into a contract on August 17, 1925, with H. O. Schaefer & Sons for the construction of a certain sewer project. The contractor executed bond for the faithful performance of the work with the appellee, Southern Surety Company, as surety. The bond contained this provision:
“Now, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said principal shall well and truly keep and perform all the agreements, terms and conditions of said contract on their part to be kept and performed, and shall…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- George H. Sampson Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
- Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Wadsworth Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Steele & Lebby v. Flynn-Sullivan Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Shunk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.