Legal Opinion
J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1930No. 4909PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, C. J.
These actions are to recover upon certain accounts incurred by the subcontractor during the course of certain highway construction work which it failed to pay and for which the plaintiffs seek to charge the surety upon the subcontractor’s bond. Below the plaintiffs had judgment, from which the surety has appealed. There are two actions tried together in this court by stipulation of the parties.
Farr, Lashus & Farr subcontracted with the general contractor for the construction of about eight miles of public highway in Beaver and Millard counties for $26,620.50. To secure the performance of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shelter America Corp. v. Ohio Casualty & Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Dennis Dillon Oldsmobile, GMC, Inc. v. ZdunichUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Goss v. Structural Concrete ProductsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
- Shoshoni Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- McCormick Saeltzer Co. v. HaidlenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.