Legal Opinion

Overman & Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Elliott & Sons and R. E. Boggs, the contractors, with the Maryland Casualty Company, on 14 December, 1921, gave a bond to the State Highway Commission in the sum of $146,540.00. The material conditions of the bond, to be considered in this action, were:(1) “For the improvement of a certain section of highway known as State Highway Project No. 525, road between Lexington and Rowan County line, beginning at station 0-00 and ending at station 541-12, situated in the county of Davidson, North Carolina, being approximately 10.24 miles long, approximately estimated to cost $293',080.”(2) “And shall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hicks v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Associated Oil Co. v. Commary-Peterson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. United States ex rel. Samuel Hastings Co. v. LowranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Fuller v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Seaton Ranch Co. v. Montana Vegetable Oil & Feed Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Furlough v. Nash County Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Bowling v. Julian Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API