Legal Opinion

Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. McQueen Smith Farming Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1927No. 3 Div. 805PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB’Ouldin, J.

McQueen Smith Farming Company, suing in the name of the state, brings this action against the Union Indemnity Company, as surety on the bond of the Riley & Bailey Construction Company, contractor, doing construction work under contract with the state highway commission. The claim is for labor and material furnished by plaintiff to the contractor for use in the construction of the Reese’s ferry bridge over the Alabama river.

The statute requires that the contractor’s bond “shall he in an amount equal to the contract price and conditioned to do and perform the work in accordance with the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von PhulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Knapp v. SwaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API