Legal Opinion

Hamilton by and Through Hamilton v. Vaden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1986No. 64002PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

On March 12, 1985, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified three questions of law to this Court. After the questions were certified, defendant Frigette Corp., individually and as successor in interest to Custom Auto Accessories Co., filed a Petition in Bankruptcy; thereafter, it sought and received a stay of these proceedings. On January 6, 1986, the stay was lifted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, and on February 10, 1986, the Western District recertified the following questions:

I…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. QuineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Thiroux Ex Rel. Cruz v. AustinMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API