Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1982No. WCB 80-01476, CA A24685PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Workers’ Compensation Board’s order on review states that it was mailed on December 31, 1981. Claimant’s petition for judicial review recites that “Claimant’s attorneys were not served with the Order on Review and Order Denying Remand until May 12, 1982.” The notice of appeal was filed on May 17, 1982. We dismissed the petition on our own motion as not being timely under ORS 656.295(8):

“An order of the board is final unless within 30 days after the date of mailing of copies of such order to the parties, one of the parties appeals to the Court of Appeals for judicial review pursuant to ORS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Stotler v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Armstrong v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Armstrong v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Catlin Abel School v. TurcotteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API