Armstrong v. Saif Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Claimant seeks reversal of a “republished” order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his aggravation claim. He urges that the Board should have remanded the case to the referee for the taking of additional evidence. Respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that we lack jurisdiction. We deny the motion to dismiss and reverse and remand to the Board.
We have written two previous opinions on this claim. Armstrong v. SAIF, 58 Or App 602, 649 P2d 818, rev den 293 Or 801 (1982); Armstrong v. SAIF, 65 Or App 809, 672 P2d 397 (1983). In the first opinion we dismissed as untimely claim - ant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Higley v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Armstrong v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Armstrong v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Egge v. Nu-SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Braich v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Farmers Insurance Group v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985