Legal Opinion

Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1988No. WCB 85-12191; CA A43382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Claimant seeks review of a “republished” order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. Because we cannot determine whether it acted properly in republishing its order, we remand to the referee for further evidence taking.

The Board initially published its order on October 8, 1986. Claimant never sought review of that order. In January, 1987, claimant and his attorney submitted affidavits to the Board which stated that neither of them had ever received the October 8 order. On February 19,1987, the Board republished its order. The republished order is exactly the same as the first order except for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Armstrong v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Armstrong v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Armstrong v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API