Legal Opinion

Noel v. Hoover

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2000No. 99CA0128PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TAUBMAN.

In this action for professional negligence, plaintiffs, Wallace R. Noel and Robinette Noel, appeal the summary judgment in favor of defendants, Wayne Hoover and Hoover, Harris and Company, P.C. (collectively Hoover), on the basis that their action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.

As pertinent here, Hoover prepared federal and state income tax returns for the Noels for the 1990 tax year. In February 1994, the Criminal Investigation Division of the United States Department of Treasury advised the Noels that it was recommending eriminal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Morrison v. GoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Escobar v. ReidDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  5. Ferrel v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API