Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1994PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ClPABICK, J.

In a malpractice action against an accountant, the Statute of Limitations begins to run on the date the accountant’s work product is received by the client since this is the first time the client can rely on the alleged negligent work product. Therefore, in this case, we conclude that only those claims relating to defendant’s negligence in connection with its advice and preparation of plaintiffs’ limited partnerships’ financial statements and tax returns, including Schedules K-l, arising in the three years prior to the commencement of this action are timely…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API