Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.K.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the orders denying Appellant standing to participate in the juvenile dependency proceedings of D.K. and W.K.1

¶ 2 Appellant raises one issue for our review: whether the trial court erred by denying Appellant standing to participate in D.K’s and W.K.’s juvenile dependency proceedings and to present himself as a placement or reunification resource for the children where he was guardian of the children prior to the commencement of dependency proceedings, acting in loco parentis for them for most of their lives, was previously determined by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Peters v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re F.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In the Interest of B.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. G.D. v. D.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In re D.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. P.T. v. M.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API