Legal Opinion

Peters v. Costello

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 2005No. 8 EAP 2004PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This Court is called upon in this appeal to determine whether “non-biological grandparents” who stand in loco parentis to one of the parents of a child with respect to whom they seek grandparental visitation rights, and who otherwise qualify to seek partial custody/visitation, have standing to seek visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act, 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 5311-13 (the “Act”). Both the trial court and the Superior Court held that appellees, the putative grandparents in this case, were entitled to pursue visitation under the Act as a result of their in loco parentis…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. K.W. v. S.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. C.G. v. J.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. RushingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API