Peters v. Costello
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
This Court is called upon in this appeal to determine whether “non-biological grandparents” who stand in loco parentis to one of the parents of a child with respect to whom they seek grandparental visitation rights, and who otherwise qualify to seek partial custody/visitation, have standing to seek visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act, 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 5311-13 (the “Act”). Both the trial court and the Superior Court held that appellees, the putative grandparents in this case, were entitled to pursue visitation under the Act as a result of their in loco parentis…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- K.W. v. S.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- C.G. v. J.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RushingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.