T.B. v. L.R.M.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This case involves the application of the doctrine of in loco parentis as a method of conferring standing on one seeking partial custody of a child for purposes of visitation. Because the evidence establishes that Appellee assumed a parental status and discharged parental duties with the consent of the biological parent, the lower courts properly held that Appellee possessed standing to seek visitation. Accordingly, we affirm.
The record establishes that Appellant and Appellee, both females, engaged in an exclusive, intimate relationship. The parties shared finances and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- J.A.L. v. E.P.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Clifford K. v. Paul S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- in the Interest of H.S., a Minor ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.