Legal Opinion

T.B. v. L.R.M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2001No. 62 WAP 2000PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This case involves the application of the doctrine of in loco parentis as a method of conferring standing on one seeking partial custody of a child for purposes of visitation. Because the evidence establishes that Appellee assumed a parental status and discharged parental duties with the consent of the biological parent, the lower courts properly held that Appellee possessed standing to seek visitation. Accordingly, we affirm.

The record establishes that Appellant and Appellee, both females, engaged in an exclusive, intimate relationship. The parties shared finances and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. J.A.L. v. E.P.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Clifford K. v. Paul S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. in the Interest of H.S., a Minor ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API