G.D. v. D.D.

OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

Appellant D.D. (“Aunt”), the maternal great-aunt of the subject minor child, G.D. (“Child”), appeals, pro se, from the order dated and entered on June 29, 2012, in which the trial court denied her emergency motion to intervene in the dependency proceedings commenced by the Berks County Children and Youth Services, (“BCCYS” or the “Agency”).1,2 We affirm.

In its opinion, the trial court sets forth the factual background and procedural history of this appeal as follows.

The minor child was declared dependent by order of [the trial court] dated June 8, 2011, following an…