Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Connolly v. Murray

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided April 13, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari by the people on the relation of Connolly against Murray and others, constituting the board of excise, to compel said board to grant a liquor license.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The relator applied to the board of excise for a license to sell strong and spirituous liquors, also wines and beer,, to be drunk on and off the premises No. 335 Amsterdam avenue, being the southeast corner of that avenue and Seventy-Sixth street. The board denied the application for the following reasons: (1) That considering the rights and interests of the property owners and residents of the neighborhood, as well as the number of existing licensed places in the vicinity of the place for which the license is sought, the board of excise is satisfied that there is no immediate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. People ex rel. Osterhout v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. In re Excise LicenseThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
  4. People ex rel. Ryan v. DaltonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Darby & Scollard v. PenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schnitzler v. YellowleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
  3. In re SchomakerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Reitman v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API