Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Haynie
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 15, 1935No. 24283PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Haynie filed claim for compensation under the workmen’s compensation laws of this State against Foremost Dairies Inc. Continental Casualty Company carried the compensation insurance for said corporation. Claimant was awarded compensation, and this award was approved by the full board of the Department of Industrial Eelations. On appeal to the superior court that judgment was affirmed and the appeal denied, and the insurance carrier and the alleged employer excepted.
1. The conception underlying workmen’s compensation is one of insurance. The scheme is equivalent in its results to a species of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Mulhall v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PixlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Fowler v. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Continental Casualty Co. v. HaynieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Gentry v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.