Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Haynie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1936No. 11073PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

This case comes before this court on the grant of a writ of certiorari. 51 Ga. App. 650 (181 S. E. 126). Under the assignments of error two questions are presented for decision by this court.

One question is raised by an assignment of error on that portion of the decision of the Court of Appeals from the beginning of the opinion through division 5, the pertinent portion of which is as follows: “Any person whose employment is not in the usual course of a trade, business, profession, or occupation of his em*609ployer, or is not incidental thereto, is excluded from the right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Travelers Insurance v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Gentry v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Lee v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Garrison v. GortlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API