Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1961No. 38982PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The defendant contends that, since it has filed an affirmative defense that the plaintiff’s injury was covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Act and on the motion for summary judgment the above quoted stipulation was before the trial court, this court’s former adjudication in this case requires an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court. We must reject this contention. On the former adjudication this court decided as to the corporate defendant, among other things, that the plaintiff’s petition was not, because of its failure to show that the employer and employee had adopted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Heskett v. Fisher Laundry & Cleaners Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Smith v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Southwire Company v. BenefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. MURRAY CHEV. CO., INC. v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Marcus M. Sands v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API