Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. England
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided August 14, 1925No. 4718PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
Section 57 of -the workmen’s compensation act provides for the hearing of the parties on any issue by the commission or any of its members. If an award is not made by the full commission, section 58 of this act provides for a review of the award by the full commission. Section 59 of this act provides “That any award of the commission, provided for in section 57, with respect to which no application for review thereof be filed in due time, or an award of the commission upon such review as provided in section 58 shall, in either event,' as the case may be, and subject to the other provisions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Conners' CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Gresham v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by75 opinions
- Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Liberty Lumber Co. v. SilasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.