Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Pixler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 14, 1939PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chapman, J. —

The record in this case discloses that Sears-Roebuck & Company operates a retail store in Jacksonville, Florida, with a Mr. Ellis as manager, Mr. F. R. Markert, supervisor, and C. C. Crowell, as supervisor of maintenance, and the claimant, Frank R. Pixler, on November 9, 1937, was a building mechanic. It became necessary to replace some plaster on the second floor of the building occupied by Sears, Roebuck & Company, likewise some plaster about a fountain on the third floor, as well as other places in the building where the plaster was in a low state of repair and about to fall.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Holmen Creamery Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. William WilkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Crabill v. LivengoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Garrison v. GortlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Peterson v. Highland Crate CooperativeSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Hicks v. KempSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API